tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7778441.post4835190100248400489..comments2008-06-25T13:27:00.946-04:00AnswerGirlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14944288413332520719lambletters@gmail.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7778441.post-80776237016280385272008-06-25T13:27:00.000-04:002008-06-25T13:27:00.000-04:00I disagree, because what Harris seemed to be saying is that her hunting down of Wild Bill was her effort to be her father's best daughter -- and in Hannibal, she has accepted a new father figure, and a new standard of what it means to be the best girl.AnswerGirlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14944288413332520719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7778441.post-83538218498397985592008-06-25T13:24:00.000-04:002008-06-25T13:24:00.000-04:00I support your assertion of Harris'right to his own characters. However, I feel he betrayed the character he gave us in Silence of the Lambs. Not that she could be wooed by evil, it was the fact that she so far to the opposite extreme... cannibalism? Please! A lesser character maybe, but not the woman who captured Wild Bill. As a stand alone novel it worked, but not after presenting Starling as he did.Larrynoreply@blogger.com